JoLIE 14:2/2021

 

Back to issue page

 

 

 

PRAGMALINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIMODAL SATIRICAL DISCURSIVE PRACTICES IN RE-NHA-NHAU IN A TRANSCULTURAL/TRANSLINGUAL CONTEXT (MADEIRA)*

 

 

Alcina Sousa

University of Madeira, Portugal; ULICES – University of Lisbon, Portugal

 

Alexandra Nunes

University of Évora, CEL-UÉ, Portugal

 

 

 

Abstract

 

Humour is often used for aesthetic, pedagogical and sociocultural purposes in satire, either dividing and/or uniting interlocutors, and simultaneously uncovering power relations, i.e., injustice and inequality (Sousa 2009a-c; Sousa, Bazenga, & Antunes 2009). Further studies are claimed (Duch 2014) to be still undertaken about the way humour is conveyed in (trans)cultural / translingual contexts as the ones in insular settings like the archipelago of Madeira (Portugal). Hence, it is relevant to see whether humour strategies evidenced in a satirical newspaper; Re-nhau-nhau (a local publication issued in Madeira throughout the 20^th century), could entail a way of raising citizens’ consciousness of the sort of power relations in cosmopolitan contexts (following the notions by Norrick, & Chiaro 2009, Dovchin, & Canagarajah 2019). Locals / residents in Madeira have been reported to be both under the sovereign influence of Portugal (as a Portuguese region), and the British socio-cultural, economic, as well as linguistic influence, due to the century-long (trans)cultural contact (Sousa 2017). Thus, this paper of empirical and exploratory kind intends to account for the way power relations are addressed in humour discursive practices, selected from a satirical newspaper issued in Madeira during dictatorship in Portugal. Do caricaturists only portray unfair situations via diverse humorous strategies to make readers aware of injustice to be overturn, in part, via the implementation of fairer government measures in the following decade? A pragmalinguistic approach underpins the analysis of twenty-two caricatures, selected from Re-nhau-nhau (between 1934 and 1948), in the line of research suggested by Kecskes, & Romero-Trillo (2013). A set of British public figures, like Henry Hinton and Graham Blandy, frequently displayed in this satirical paper, have led the selection criterion of the corpus to be studied, given their meaning potential as multimodal discursive practices. This study entails the study of coherence, irony (i.e., echoic irony in Attardo’s stance, 2000), speech acts (Austin 1962; Searle 1996) and face-threatening acts (Brown, & Levinson 1987) as mechanisms to achieve humour and social intervention goals in the corpus selected for this study. Research findings point to the relevance of pragmalinguistic strategies to disambiguate humour strategies as well as the underlying aesthetic and pedagogical effect of caricatures in Re-nhau-nhau. Power and agency are overturned and defamiliarized in the dialogic process of meaning making always with a humorous undertone, sometimes making use of conceptual metaphors and translanguaging. Considering the principle of ridendo castigat mores, this satirical paper points to some discrepancy concerning the way the sets of British residents (Mr Hinton and Mr Blandy) are represented, being Henry Hinton the most openly criticized figure at the time.

 

Keywords: Humour; Caricature; Re-nhau-nhau; Madeira; Pragmalinguistic strategies.

 

 

References

 

Allwood, J. (1998). Cooperation and flexibility in multimodal communication. In H. Bunt, & R.-J. Beun (Eds.), Cooperative multimodal communication. Second International Conference CMC’98 (pp. 113-124). Tilburg: Springer.

 

Amante, D.J. (1981). The theory of ironic speech acts. Poetics Today. Narratology III: Narration and Perspective in Fiction, 2(2), 77-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1772191

 

Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793-826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3

 

Attardo, S. (2008). Semantics and pragmatics of humor. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(6), 1203-1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00107.x

 

Attardo, S. (2017a). Humor in language. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.342

Attardo, S. (2017b). The general theory of verbal humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 126-142). New York: Routledge. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162.ch10

 

Attardo, S., Eisterhold, J., Hay, J., & Pogg, I. (2003). Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 16(2), 243-260. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.012

 

Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3–4), 292–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293

 

Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Bakhtin, M. (1984a). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics, vol. 8. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

 

Bakhtin, M. (1984b). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

 

Barthes, R. (1977). Elements of semiology (A. Lavers, & C. Smith, Trans.). New York. Hill and Wang. (Original work published as an essay in the journal Communications in 1964).

 

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Brummett, P. (1995). Dogs, women, cholera, and other menaces in the streets: Cartoon satire in the Ottoman revolutionary press, 1908–11. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 27(04), 433–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743800062498

 

Clark, H.H., & Gerrig, R.J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113(1), 121-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121

 

Clark, U., & Zyngier, S. (2003). Towards a pedagogical stylistics. Language and Literature, 12(4), 339-351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470030124003

 

Clode, L.P. (1983a). Graham, Blandy. Registo Bio-bibliográfico de Madeirenses. sécs. XIX e XX (p.72). Funchal: Edição da Caixa Económica da Madeira.

 

Clode, L.P. (1983b). Hinton, Harry. Registo Bio-bibliográfico de Madeirenses. sécs. XIX e XX (pp. 258-259). Funchal: Edição da Caixa Económica da Madeira.

 

Delgado, L., & Araki, M. (2005). Spoken. multilingual and multimodal dialogue systems: development and assessment. Chichester: John Wiley, & Son. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470021578

 

Dovchin, S., & Canagarajah, S. (2019). The everyday politics of translingualism as transgressive practice. In J.W. Lee, & S. Dovchin (Eds.). Translinguistics, negotiating innovation and ordinariness (pp.163-178). London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449918

 

Duch, J. (2014). The cross-cultural pragmatics of humour. Munich: GRIN Verlag, Retrieved 6 October, 2020, from https://www.grin.com/document/511881

 

Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2004). Reactions of irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1239-1256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003

 

Ermida, I. (2005). When saying is not meaning: a pragmatic approach to humorous irony. In P. Cap (Ed.), Pragmatics today (pp. 235-244). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

 

Ermida, I. (2009). Together or apart: Targeting, offence and group dynamics in humour. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 2(2), 93-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2009.2.2.11

 

França, J.-A. (2007). Rafael Bordalo Pinheiro. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.

 

Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239-264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544916

 

Goatly, A. (2012). Meaning and humour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791536

 

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Routledge.

 

Gomes, S. (2015). Jogos tradicionais. Aprender Madeira. Retrieved 7 February, 2020, from http://aprenderamadeira.net/article/jogos-tradicionais

 

Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Speech Acts, 3, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.

 

Grice, P. (2008). Further notes on logic and conversation. Reasoning: Studies of human inference and its foundations (pp. 765-773). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Haverkate, H. (1990). A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(1), 77-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L

 

Janes, E. (2017). Re-nhau-nhau: trimensário humorístico. Aprender Madeira. Retrieved 20 November, 2018, from http://aprenderamadeira.net/article/re-nhau-nhau-trimensario-humoristico

 

Johnstone, B. (2009). Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 29-52). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331646.003.0002

 

Kecskes, I., & Romero-Trillo, J. (2013). Research trends in intercultural pragmatics. Boston/Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513735

 

Kramer, C.A., (2015). Subversive Humor (Published Doctoral Dissertation). Marquette University Retrieved 20 February, 2021, from https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1424&context=dissertations_mu

 

Kramer, C. (2020). Subversive humor as art and the art of subversive humor. The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook, 1(1), 153–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/phhumyb-2020-0012

 

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.

 

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London/New York: Routledge.

 

Kress, G. (2012). Multimodal discourse analysis. In J.P. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 35-50). London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068

 

Kwon, W., Mackay, R., Clarke, I., Wodak, R., & Vaara, E. (2020). Testing, stretching, and aligning: Using ‘ironic personae’ to make sense of complicated issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 166, 44-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.001

 

Lebold, C. (2007). A face like a mask and a voice that croaks: an integrated poetics of Bob Dylan’s voice, personae, and lyrics. Oral Tradition, 22(1), 57-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/ort.2007.0016

 

Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.

 

Lopes, A. (2009). A obra de Fernão de Ornelas vista pelo Re-nhau-nhau: 1935-1946. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education - JoLIE, 2(2), 165-177. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2009.2.2.17

 

Mascha, E. (2011). Mocking fascism: Popular culture and political satire as counter-hegemony. In V. Tsakona, & D. E. Popa (Eds.), Studies in political humour: In between political critique and public entertainment (pp. 191-214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.46.12mas

 

McCracken, S. (1998). Pulp: Reading popular fiction. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

 

Meddaugh, P.M. (2010). Bakhtin, Colbert, and the center of discourse: Is there no “truthiness” in humor? Critical Studies in Media Communication, 27(4), 376-390. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030903583606

 

Norrick, R., & Chiaro, D. (Eds.). (2009). Humour in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182

 

Oliveira, R.P. (2018). Hinton. Henry Calverly. Aprender Madeira. Retrieved 20 December, 2018, from http://aprenderamadeira.net/article/hinton-henry-calverley

 

Pedrazzini, A., & Scheuer, N. (2019). Modal functioning of rhetorical resources in selected multimodal cartoons. Semiotica, 2019(230), 275-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0116

 

Pedro, E.R. (1998). Análise crítica do discurso: uma perspectiva sociopolítica e funcional. Lisboa: Editorial Caminho.

 

Perkins, D. (1975). A definition of caricature and caricature and recognition. Studies in Visual Communication, 2(1), 1-23. Retrieved 2 December, 2018, from https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol2/iss1/2

 

Reyes, G. (1994). La pragmática linguística: el estudio del uso del lenguaje. Barcelona: Montesinos.

 

Rodrigues, M. (2015). Estudos sobre o século XIX na Madeira: política. economia e migração. Funchal: Imprensa Académica.

 

Said, E. (1984). The world, the text and the critic. Massachusetts/Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

 

Santos, T.P. (2011). A imprensa humorística e satírica na Madeira: o humor de ontem. o Re-nhau-nhau. e o humor de hoje. o Garajau e o Furabardos. In H. Rebelo (Ed.), Lusofonia: Tempo de Reciprocidades. Actas do IX Congresso da Associação Internacional de Lusitanistas (4^th-9^th August 2008). University of Madeira. vol. II (pp. 511-522). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.

 

Searle, J. (1996). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

 

Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2

 

Sousa, A. (2008). Retórica e poder: representações do discurso empresarial em textos multimodais dos media. Organicon: Discurso Institucional. Linguagem e Retórica, 5(9), 144-165. Retrieved 15 December, 2018, from https://www.revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/138990

 

Sousa, A. (2009a). Developing Reading Strategies Based on Literary Text -The Diary Novel: Sue Townsend’s Adrian Mole’s Saga (Published PhD dissertation), University of Madeira. Retrieved 7 October, 2020, from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.13/1423

 

Sousa, A. (2009b). Adrian Mole’s saga or an instance of common readers’ emotional involvement with satire?. Topics in Linguistics, 3, 12-24. Retrieved 7 October, 2020, from https://www.kaa.ff.ukf.sk/topicsinlinguistics/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/issue3.pdf

 

Sousa, A. (2009c). Adrian strikes back with style and humour. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education - JoLIE, 2(2), 277-292. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2009.2.2.27

 

Sousa, A. (2017, October 17-18). Communicating in English in Madeira: lingua franca / economica? Notes from the field. Paper presented at Second International Philological Conference in Piła, Communication-Culture-Space-Identity. Stanislaw Staszic University of Applied Sciences, p. 26. Retrieved 7 October, 2020, from https://docplayer.pl/69096187-Ksiega-streszczen-book-of-abstracts.html

 

Sousa, A. (2018, October 25-26). Voyage and cosmopolitanism: the long relationship between Portuguese and English in Madeira. International Conference Voyage and cosmopolitanism: From the island to the world. University of Madeira, p. 7. Retrieved 7 October, 2020, from https://digituma.uma.pt/handle/10400.13/2351

 

Sousa, A., Bazenga, A., & Antunes, L.M. (2009). Crosscultural humour: ‘Humour that divides; humour that unites’. An introduction. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education - JoLIE, 2(2), 9-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2009.2.2

 

Sousa, A., & Marçalo, M. J. (2018, April 25). Communicating in Madeira: identity, cosmopolitanism, heritage – evidence from the field. 39th APEAA Meeting. University of Évora, pp. 44-45. Retrieved 7 October, 2020, from http://www.apeaa.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/39th_APEAA_Meeting_Resumos-Abstracts.pdf

 

Studying Humour-International Journal. Retrieved 20 February, 2021, from https://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/humour

 

Subversive. Merriam Webster Learner’s Dictionary. Retrieved 17 February, 2021 from https://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/subversive

 

The International Society for Humor Studies. Retrieved 20 February, 2021, from http://www.humorstudies.org/

 

Vieira, A. (2004). Canaviais. açúcar e aguardente na Madeira: séculos XV a XX. Coleção História do Açúcar n.º3. CEHA: Funchal.

 

Vieira, A. (2016a). Hinton. Aprender Madeira. Retrieved 20 November, 2018, from http://aprenderamadeira.net/article/hinton

 

Vieira, A. (2016b). Família. Blandy. Aprender Madeira. Retrieved 20 November, 2018, from http://aprenderamadeira.net/article/blandy-familia

 

Vieira, A. (2016c). Ingleses. Aprender Madeira. Retrieved 20 November, 2018, from http://aprenderamadeira.net/article/ingleses

 

Wales, K. (2011). A dictionary of stylistics. London/New York: Routledge.

 

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87(1), 53-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-E

 

Zajdman, A. (1995). Humorous face-threatening acts: Humor as strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 325–339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00038-G

 

Ziv, A. (1984). Personality and sense of humor. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

 

Ziv, A. (1988). Humor’s role in married life. Humor: The International Journal of Humor Research, 1(3), 223–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1988.1.3.223  

 

 

How to cite this article: Sousa, A. & Nunes, A. (2021). Pragmalinguistic analysis of multimodal satirical discursive practices in Re-nha-nhau in a transcultural/translingual context (Madeira). Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 14(2), 141-168. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2021.14.2.8

 

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en