JoLIE 6/2013

Back to issue page







Veronica Dur

Dorin Pavel Technical College, Alba Iulia, Romania






The aim of this paper is to ascertain the effectiveness of modern methods used in teaching English grammar. It may be asserted that English grammar is not very difficult, although at first it appears to cause confusion. Over the past years emphasis has been laid on traditional methods, teachers trying to attempt only recently new modern methods, all these attempts being considered to make the student become more interested in the English language. Modern methods help a student understand and improve grammar more easily and in a more entertaining way than the traditional ones. Modern activities are meant to widen the students’ horizon and make them realize that grammar is not only theory, but also practice and fun. The teacher can use oral communicative activities, such as discussions, giving instructions, communication games, role play, etc., or written communicative activities, emphasis being laid on accuracy, fluency and the purpose of writing. The efficiency of modern methods could be seen when comparing two classes, both of the same level, one of them being taught traditionally and the other one using modern activities. All this experiment was done in one school year, the methods used during the classes being followed by tests and an analysis of the results obtained. Modern methods made the English classes a lot easier, especially when it came to teaching grammar; students had more fun, were more relaxed, enjoyed the class, communicated with their colleagues and acquired new knowledge quite fast.


Keywords: Teaching grammar; Modern teaching methodology; Grammar games; Communicative approach.





Baudains, R., & Baudains, M. (1990). Alternatives: Games, exercises and conversations for the language classroom. London/New York: Longman.


Byrne, D. (1995). Teaching writing skills. London/New York: Longman.


Byrne, D. (1996). Teaching oral English. London/New York: Longman.


Edge, J. (1993). Essentials of English language teaching. London/New York: Longman.


Hadfield, J. (1996). Advanced communication games. London/New York: Longman.


Hadfiled, J. (1985). Elementary communication games. Walton-on-Thames: Thomas Nelson and Sons.


Harmer, J. (1997). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York: Longman.


Heaton, J. B. (1995). Writing English language tests. London/New York: Longman.


Hedge, T. (1988). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Hill, A. D. (1990). Visual impact – Creative language learning through pictures. London/New York: Longman.


Howard-Williams, D., & Herd, C. (1994). Word games with English. New York: Macmillan.


Ladousse-Porter, G. (1994). Role play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


McCallum, P. G. (1980). 101 word games. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Popescu, T. (2006). Elaborarea și implementarea curriculum-ului de limba engleză la facultățile cu profil economic. Alba Iulia: Editura Aeternitas.


Rinvolucri, M. (1984). Grammar games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Scheibner, K. (1995). Ready-made English. London: Heinemann.


Ur, P. (1994). Grammar practice activities: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.



How to cite this article: Dur, V.  (2013). Modern communicative methods of teaching English grammar to intermediate level students. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 6, 89106. DOI:



For details on subscription, go to: