JoLIE 8/2015

Back to issue page

 

 

 

CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES IN TEACHING SPECIALISED LANGUAGES

 

 

Andrea Peterlicean

Hungarian University of Sapientia, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Faculty of Technical and Human Sciences, Tg.-Mureș

 

 

 

Abstract

 

Teaching and learning LSP have been part of a complex change. Starting from studies about the linguistic structure of specialised texts, through vocabularies and types of jargon, LSP has been in the focus of researchers trying to analyse lexemes and their statistical frequency, as well as to establish text typologies. While it is possible to make some generalisation about the way specialised discourses function, it is daily practice that brings evidence as to the usefulness of theories when applied in the language classroom. This paper briefly analyses some of problems that teachers are confronted with when trying to blend theory with practice in the ESP classroom.

 

Keywords: Communication; Professional settings; ESP; EAP; Technical writing.

 

 

References

 

Alinte, C. (2013). Teaching grammar through music. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 6, 7–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2013.6.1

 

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153  

 

Benton, C. W. (2013). Promoting metacognition in music classes. Music Educators Journal, 100, 5259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432113500077

 

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains: Pearson Education.

 

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). London: Longman.

 

Charaudeau, P., & Maingueneau, D. (2002). Dictionnaire d’Analyse du Discours, Paris: Éd. du Seuil.

 

Crowther, D., & Green, M. (2004). Organisational theory. London: CIPD.

 

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.

 

Freedman, A., Pringle, I., & Yalden, J. (1983). Learning to write: First language/Second language. London: Longman.

 

Gross, A. (1996). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

 

Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

 

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

 

Mackay, R., & Mountford, A. (Eds.). (1978). English for specific purposes. London: Longman.

 

Miendlarzewska, E. A., & Trost, W. J. (2013). How musical training affects cognitive development: Rhythm, reward and other modulating variables. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 279. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00279

 

Popescu, T. (2013). Developing English linguistics students’ translation competence through the language learning process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1075–1079. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.333  

 

Popescu, T. (2011). Developing business students’ mental lexicon in English. In T. Popescu, R. Pioariu, & C. Herţeg (Eds.), Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to the English Language: Theory and Practice (pp. 1930). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

 

Popescu, T. (2007). Teaching business collocations. In D. Galova (Ed.), Languages for Specific Purposes: Searching for Common Solutions (pp. 163176). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

 

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.

 

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Columbia University Press.

 

Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

 

Wilson, J. (2008). How to teach listening. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

 

 

Webliography

 

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-1/role.htm

 

Bagaric, V. (2007). Defining communicative competence. Metodika, 8(1), 94103. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from http://www.hrcak.srce.hr/file/42651

 

Fulwiler T., & Jones, R. (2000). Assigning and evaluating transactional writing. In T. Fulwiler & A. Young, (Eds.) Language connections writing and reading across the Curriculum. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/language_connections/chapter4.pdf on 10.07.2015

 

Hill, R. (n.d.) AIDA: Attention-Interest-Desire-Action: Inspiring Action with Your Writing. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/AIDA.htm

 

Lackstrom, D., Selinker, J., & Trimble, L. (1973). Technical rhetorical principles and grammatical choice. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://academic.pgcc.edu/

 

Mannes, E. (2011). ‘The power of music’ to affect the brain. Author Interviews. Retrieved February 13, 2015, from http://www.npr.org/2011/06/01/136859090/the-power-of-music-to-affect-the-brain/   

 

Mcfedries, P. (2009). The Effect Effect in IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved May 15 2015, from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-effect-effect

 

Van Dijk, T. (2001). Specialized discourse and knowledge. Retrieved May 1, 2015, from www.discourses.org

 

 

How to cite this article: Peterlicean, A. (2015). Challenges and perspectives in teaching specialised languages. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 8, 149162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2015.8.10

 

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en