JoLIE 8/2015

 

Back to issue page

 

 

 

PROLIFERATION AND RECEPTION OF COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOURS:

AN ANALYSIS OF THE INSTITUTION OF UNIVERSITY

 

 

Marcin Krawczak

Stanislaw Staszic University of Applied Sciences in Piła, Poland

 

 

 

Abstract

 

The following article pursuits the objective of demonstrating the university’s communicative dynamics in terms of proliferation and reception of language and non-language resources within the Polish public space.

The two main groups which are analysed in the article are: inner-communicators perceived as operating within an institution and outer-communicators that is general public space users who have access to the resources offered by an institution. The first group proliferates the institutional assets via their communicative behaviour dynamics; the other group receives these behaviours in a particular fashion. This article unveils the activity of the university in three domains: institutional, cultural and communicative that provide the background for its analysis.

 

Key words: The university; Communicative behaviour dynamics; Institutions; Communicators; Language and non-language resources.

 

 

References

 

Bento, A. V. (2013). The leadership of the Portuguese community schools of the East Coast of the United States and cultural identity: A multiple case study. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 6, 77–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2013.6.5       

 

Bhagat, R. S., & Steers, R. M. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Blaut, J. M. (1961). Space and process. The Professional Geographer, 13(4), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1961.134_1.x

 

Brzeziński, J., & Nowak, L. (Eds.). (1997). The idea of the University: Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 50). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

 

Deely, J., & Sbrocchi, L. G. (Eds.). (2008). Semiotics 2008: Specialization, semiosis, semiotics. Ottawa: Legas.

 

De Silveira, G., & Slack, N. (2001). Exploring the trade-off concept. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(7), 949–964.

 

Lewis, C. T., & Short, C. (1966). A Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1879)

 

Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (Eds.). (1997). Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

 

Kull, K. (2009). The importance of semiotics to University: Semiosis makes the world locally plural. In J. Deely & L. G. Sbrocchi (Eds.). Semiotics 2008: Specialization, semiosis, semiotics (pp. 494–514). Ottawa: Legas.

 

Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

 

Nardon, L., & Steers, R. M. (2009). The culture theory jungle: Divergence and convergence in models of national culture. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations and work (pp. 3–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Popescu, T. (2011). The role of culture in business communication. In L. Dragolea, M. I. Achim & J. Grabara (Eds.), Business negotiation and communication: Monograph (pp. 82–97). Czestochowa: Czestochowa University of Technology Faculty of Management.

 

Puppel, S. (2004). An outline of a domain-resource-agent-access-management (DRAAM) model of human communication: Towards an ecology of human communication. Electronic Journal Oikeios Logos, 1, 1–27.

 

Puppel, S. (2009). Remarks on the sustainability of natural languages in the cultural-institutional perspective. In S. Puppel & M. Bogusławska-Tafelska (Eds.), New pathways in linguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 275–286), Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski.

 

Puppel, S. (2011a). An outline of a multiple triune continuum model of language and communication. Electronic Journal Oikeios Logos, 8, 1–25.

 

Puppel, S. (2011b). Human communication and communicative skills: a general philosophy and evolving practical guidelines. In S. Puppel & M. Bogusławska-Tafelska (Eds.), New pathways in linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 107–118). Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski.

 

Puppel, S., & Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (Eds.). (2009). New pathways in linguistics (Vol. 2). Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski.

 

Puppel, S., & Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (Eds.). (2011). New pathways in linguistics (Vol. 4). Olsztyn: Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski.

 

Rothbard, M. N. (2008). The mystery of banking (2nd ed.). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

 

Sebeok, T. A. (1991). Semiotics in the United States. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

 

Sousa, A. & Lourenço, J. (2012). The rhetoric of regional planning: A cross-disciplinary approach. Topics in Linguistics 9, 28–41.

 

Speake, J. (Ed.). (1979). A dictionary of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.

 

Tonnelat, S. (2010). The sociology of urban public spaces. In H. Wang, M. Savy & M. Zhai Guofang (Eds.), Territorial evolution and planning solution: Experiences from China and France (pp. 1–10). Paris: Atlantis Press.

 

Twardowski, K. (1997). The Majesty of the University. In J. Brzeziński, & L. Nowak (Eds.), The idea of the University: Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 50, pp. 9–20). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

 

Wang, H., Savy, M., & Zhai, G. (Eds.). (2010). Territorial evolution and planning solution: Experiences from China and France. Paris: Atlantis Press.

 

Weber, M., Roth, G., & Wittich, C. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

 

Woolley, H. (2003). Urban open spaces. London/New York: Spon Press.

 

Van der Laan, D. H. (1983). Architectonic space. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

 

 

How to cite this article: Krawczak, M. (2015). Proliferation and reception of communicative behaviours: An analysis of the institution of university. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 8, 119–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2015.8.8

 

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en