TEACHING BUSINESS ENGLISH THROUGH METAPHORS
1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia, Romania
This article relies on an experiment conducted at 1 Decembrie 1918 University in Alba Iulia with students enrolled in Accountancy and Finances and Banking programmes. The experiment is part of a research project funded by the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation and coordinated by Teodora Popescu. It aims to measure students` awareness of conceptual metaphors in business English contexts. To this end, students were assigned with the task of identifying and explaining business metaphors from business texts retrieved from the English corpus incorporated as part of the project deliverable. The experiment consisted of two stages: pre-experimental stage which mainly consisted in giving students input on conceptual metaphors and their role in business genre. The second stage consisted in identification and explanation of conceptual metaphors. The follow-up of these stages was the interpretation of students` results. In order to measure students’ results in the experiment the teacher processed their findings and designed two scoring procedures. After processing students` findings possible solutions and explanations are provided. The experiment relies on previous work in the field, mainly on the experiments conducted by Jeannette Littlemore (2000, 2001, 2003, 2008, 2011).
Keywords: Conceptual metaphors; Business English; Business discourse; Teaching process.
Boers, F., & Littlemore, J. (2000). Cognitive style variables in participants’ explanation of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and symbol, 15(3), 177-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1503_4
Boers, F., & Stengers, H. (2008). Adding sound to the picture. Motivating the lexical composition of metaphorical idioms in English, Dutch and Spanish. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M.C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use. An applied linguistic approach (pp. 63-78) Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Charteris-Black, J., & Ennis, T. (2001). A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 249-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00009-0
Charteris-Black, J., & Musolff, A. (2003). 'Battered hero' or 'innocent victim'? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 153-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00012-1
Charteris- Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Herrera-Soler, H., & White, M. (2012). (Eds.). Metaphors and mills. Figurative language in business and economics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Herteg, C. (2015). Corpus-based approach to money metaphors in business English. In T. Popescu, & G.-D. Iordăchescu (Eds.), Universal and variants of English and Romanian business metaphors. A corpus-based conceptual mapping of contemporary journalese from a pedagogical approach. Proceedings of Project kick-off meeting (pp.51-63). Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Koller, V. (2008). Brothers in arms. Contradictory metaphors in contemporary marketing discourse. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M.C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use. An applied linguistic approach (pp. 103-125). Amsterdam/Phgiladelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Kovecses, Z. (2005). Metaphors in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor. A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, J. (2001). Metaphoric competence: A possible language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style? TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 459-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588031
Littlemore, J. (2003). The effect of cultural background on metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and symbol, 18(4), 273-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_4
Littlemore, J. (2008). The relationship between associative thinking, analogical reasoning, image formation and metaphoric extension strategies. In M.S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use. An applied linguistic approach (pp. 199-222). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Littlemore, J., Chen, P., Koester, A., & Barden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied linguistics, 32(4), 408-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009
Resche, C. (2012). Towards a better understanding of metaphorical networks in the language of economics: The importance of theory-constitutive metaphors. In H. Herrera-Soler, & M. White (Eds.), Metaphors and mills. Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 77-102). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Sardinha, T.B. (2012). Metaphors of the Brazilian economy from 1964 to 2010. In H. Herrera-Soler, & M. White (Eds.), Metaphors and mills. Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 103-126). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Skorczynska, H. (2012). Metaphor and knowledge specialization in business management. The case of project management discourse. In H. Herrera-Soler, & M. White (Eds.), Metaphors and mills. Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 265-290). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Velasco Sacristan, M. (2005). Metaphor & ESP. Metaphor as a useful device for teaching L2 Business English learners. Iberica, 10, 115-131.
White, M. (2003). Metaphors and economics. The case of growth. English for specific purposes, 22(2), 131-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00006-6
How to cite this article: Herțeg, M.-C. (2017). Teaching business English through metaphors. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 10(2), 47-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2017.10.2.4
For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en
This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-2785.