JoLIE 12:2/2019


Back to issue page







Alina-Andreea Dragoescu Urlica

BUASVM Michael I of Romania – Timişoara, Romania






The latest developments in electronic media have radically altered the language use landscape, such as by triggering long-term effects on users’ interactive potential and communicative standards. Current communicative practices relying on the latest technologies, as well as learning through electronic devices in virtual spaces, have generated new strategies for language acquisition with unintended side effects. Therefore, taking pervasive digitalisation into account, socio-affective language teaching strategies should become active tools for promoting communication based on emotional intelligence (EI) in the case of students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). This study explores the opportunities afforded by AS (affective strategies) and SS (social strategies) with the aim to develop learners’ language proficiency. It highlights listening competence, which I argue is a stepping-stone for achieving empathic awareness. Based on previous research, which suggested that both AS and SS represent an underutilised resource in the foreign language classroom, the need for more effective teaching methodologies is addressed with this target in mind (Arslan et al. 2012; Dragoescu 2014). The paper addresses the benefits of using listening and collaborative learning to enhance peer interaction and EI levels. Specifically, it emphasises the practicality of using these strategies to develop communicative and sociolinguistic competence and, ultimately, EFL proficiency. These types of language learning strategies (LLS) can be used as relevant resources in teaching, as they hold the key to propelling optimal education by means of learning to communicate in a foreign language. Thereby, educators are offered the opportunity to create a meaningful learning environment, as well as to enhance the personal growth potential of language learners.


Keywords: EFL; Communicative competence; Active listening; Socio-affective strategies; EQ; Language proficiency.





Alcaro, A, Carta, S., & Panksepp, J. (2017). The affective core of the self: A neuro-archetypical perspective on the foundations of human (and animal) subjectivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1424. DOI:


Arslan, H., Rata, G., Yavuz, A., & Dragoescu, A. A. (2012). Comparative study of language learning strategies of Romanian and Turkish students.  European Scientific Journal, 8(28), 136-154. DOI:


Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (2016). Ecolinguistics. Communication processes at the seam of life. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI:


Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (2013). Towards an ecology of language, communication and the mind. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI:


Coroamă, L. I., Dragoescu Urlica, A. A., Groszler, A., & Lungu, M. (2018). An ecological approach to ESP teaching/learning: Challenges and limitations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Life Sciences (pp. 347-351). Bologna: Filodiritto International Proceedings.


Coroamă, L. (2016). Bridging the gap between teaching language and teaching culture in a foreign language course.  RJAS, 48, 14-18.


Dragoescu Urlica, A. A., & Stefanović, S. (2018). Ecolinguistic qualities of the optimal English language learning experience.  International Journal for Quality Research, 12(2), 537-546. DOI:


Dragoescu, A. A. (2014). On a joint research project assessing language learning strategies used by university students of EFL in Turkey and Romania. The Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 7, 81-91. DOI:


Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.


Goleman, D. (2013). Focus. The hidden driver of excellence. New York: Harper Collins.


Jervis, K.., & Tobier, A. (1988). Education for democracy: Proceedings from the Cambridge School Conference on Progressive Education, October, 1987. Weston, Mass.: Cambridge School.


Kamberi, L. (2009). Computer versus classroom instruction: The big dilemma! SEEU Review, (5)1, 153-172, Arberia Design.


Kamberi, L. (2012). Computer assisted versus classroom instruction: The big dilemma – revised. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70(2013), 1691-1695. DOI:


Kurteš, S. (2019). Theme-centred interaction in the context of intercultural education and the constructivist-inspired pedagogy: Potentialities and perspectives. In S. Meyerhuber et al. (Eds.), Theme-centred interaction (TCI) in higher education (pp. 221-242). Berlin: Springer. DOI:


Kurteš, S., Larina, T., & Ozyumenko, V. (2017). A constructivist approach to intercultural communication teaching and learning. In EDULEARN17 Proceedings: 9th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. 3-5 July 2017 (pp. 591-597). Barcelona: IATED. DOI:


Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer, & J. Van Der Zeuwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes: Observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems (pp. 172-192). London: Sage.


Maturana, H., & Dávila Paz, X. (2006). The biology of knowing and the biology of loving: Education as viewed from the biological matrix of human existence. Prelac Journal, 2, 30-39.


Maturana, H. (1987). The biological foundations of self-consciousness and the physical domain of existence. In E. Caianiello (Ed.), Physics of cognitive processes (pp. 324-379). World Scientific.


Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel Publishing Company.


Panksepp, J. (2005). Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans.  Consciousness and Cognition, 14(1), 30-80. DOI:


Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition, and learning. Amsterdam: Elsevier.


Pask, G. (1996). Heinz von Foerster’s self-organisation, the progenitor of conversation and interaction theories. Systems Research, 13(3), 349-362. DOI:<349:AID-SRES103>3.0.CO;2-G


Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.


Sousa, A. (2015, March). Focusing on language learning strategies in English higher education - Changing patterns of resources and literacy landscapes. Paper presented at 2nd Exploratory Workshop – Internationalisation of Higher Education: Challenges and Rewards, Alba Iulia. Retrieved from Conference Book of Abstracts.


Sousa, A. (2015a, November). Listening as an integrative skill in promoting effective and intercultural communication. Paper presented at the International Academic Seminar ‘Bridges and not Walls’, Philological Seminars in Piła, Poland. Retrieved from Bridges and not Walls Conference Book of Abstracts,


Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.


Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Recent advances (pp. 245-259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.



How to cite this article: Dragoescu Urlica, A.-A. (2019). Teaching listening at the tertiary level in blended and/or blending environments. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 12(2), 53-64. DOI:



For details on subscription, go to: