JoLIE 12:3/2019

Back to issue page

FREE INDIRECT DISCOURSE AND POSSIBLE WORLDS IN IAN MCEWAN’S THE CHILD IN TIME

Adriana Diana Urian

Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Abstract

The paper discusses the nature of free indirect discourse and the manner in which it appears within postmodern fiction, more precisely in Ian McEwan’s novel The Child in Time, through the modality of possible world semantics. First it explains how free indirect discourse should be understood in this context, outlining the theoretical introduction and justification of this particular approach. The subsequent discussion focuses on speech acts and how they can be understood theoretically and in a fictional universe. It then showcases how free indirect discourse works in Ian McEwan’s The Child in Time, which offers an excellent case study for this type of analysis, given the fact that the novel is a third person narrative, an indirect account of events, and a reported story, and thus a perfect sample of free indirect discourse in fiction. Finally, by blending these perspectives within the narrative universe and observing how they render a structural matrix of fiction upon which worlds of possibility can be modally distinguished, the paper will prove that the analysis of free indirect discourse completes the picture of narrative syntax within possible world determinism.

Keywords: Possible worlds; Free indirect discourse; Possible world semantics; Fictional discourse.

References

Austin, J.L. (1980). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bal, M. (1983). The narrating and the focalizing: A theory of the agents in a narrative. Style, 17(2), 234-269.

Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics: Theory and history of literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Chatman, S. (1978). Narrative structure in fiction and film. London: Cornell University Press.

Currie, G. (1990). The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Derrida, J. (1981). Dissemination. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

Fludernik, M. (2005). The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. London: Routledge.

Frege, G. (1970). On sense and reference. Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Blackwell.

Genette, G. (1988). Narrative discourse revisited. NY: Cornell University Press.

McEwan, I. (1992). The child in time. London: Vintage Books.

Oltean, S. (1993). A survey of the pragmatic and referential functions of free indirect discourse. Poetics Today, 14(4), 691-714.

Plantinga, A. (2003). Essays in the metaphysics of modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, New Series, 14(56) (Oct. 1905), 479-493.

Ryan, M.L. (2004). La narración como realidad virtual. La inmersión y la interactividad en la literatura y en los medios electrónicos. Barcelona. Paidós.

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seymour, B.C. (1978). Story and discourse. Narrative structure in fiction and film. London: Cornell University Press.

Sternberg, M. (1982). Point of view and the indirections of direct speech. Language and Style, 15, 67-117.

Stanzel, F.K. (1984). A theory of narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

How to cite this article: Urian, A.D. (2019). Free indirect discourse and possible worlds in Ian McEwan’s The child in time. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 12(3), 123-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2019.12.3.8

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en