JoLIE 13/2020
Marta Bogusławska-Tafelska
Lomza State University of Applied Sciences, Poland
Abstract
Western science and academia have entered the new millennium with the growing realisation that their theoretical and utilitarian limits have been reached. A particular threshold is experienced across traditional academic disciplines, which is visible in the fact that, on the one hand, the intensity of social, environmental, psychological, health-related and communicational problems people deal with in their everyday lives is increasing; on the other hand, theoretical models and intervention programs that scholarly work provides do not meet the growing necessity. Our paper presents a research project whose starting-point aims are to explore the doctor-patient communication dyad, its functions in the healing process, and to propose a theoretical as well as applicative way forward. In the plans for our research, we aim to study the integrative medical approach and the ways in which language and communication processes allow healing to happen and optimal health to be preserved.
Keywords: Doctor-patient communication dyad; Integrative medicine; Ecolinguistic aspects; Biosemiotics; Healing process; Self-healing; Holistic; New paradigm.
References
Anderson, B., Jurawanichkul, S., Kligler, B.E., Marantz, P.R., & Evans, R. (2019). Interdisciplinary relationship models for complementary and integrative health: Perspectives of Chinese medicine practitioners in the United States. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 25(3). 288–295. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0268
Atmanspacher, H., Rӧmer, H., & Walach, H. (2002). Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations in Physics, 32, 379-406.
Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (2009). The language of medicine: Some remarks on the communicative intention violation. Acta Neophilologica, XI, 21-26. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo UWM.
Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (2013). Towards an ecology of language, communication and the mind. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (2016). Ecolinguistics. Communication processes at the seam of life. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Bordogna, M.T. (2011). Regional health systems and non-conventional medicine: The situation in Italy. EPMA Journal, 2, 411–423. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-011-0098-6
Brera, G.R. (2017). Introduction to a medical science and health paradigm change. Presentation at the Milan Conference: Medical Science and Health Paradigm Change. Milan, 13-14-15 October 2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31541.06880
Brier, S. (2016). Cybersemiotics as a transdisciplinary model for interdisciplinary biosemiotic pharmacology and medicine. In F. Goli (Ed.), Biosemiotic medicine. Healing in the world of meaning (pp. 23-84). Dordrecht: Springer.
Cassell, E.J. (1976). The healer’s art: A new approach to the doctor-patient relationship. New York: Lippincott.
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics. The basics. London/New York: Routledge.
Charon, R. (2005). Narrative medicine: Attention, affiliation, representation. Narrative, 13(3), 261–70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2005.0017
Cibangu, S. K. (2010). Paradigms, methodologies, and methods. Library and Information Science Research, 32, 177-178.
Cowley, S.J. (2018). Life and language: Is meaning biosemiotics? Language Sciences, 67, 46-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.04.004
Cowley, S.J., & Gahrn-Andersen, R. (2018). Semiosis and bio-mechanism: towards consilience. Biosemiotics, 1-21. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9346-7
Culler, J. (1981). Story and discourse in the analysis of narrative. The pursuit of signs. Semiotics, literature, deconstruction (pp.169-87). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Danesi, M. (1998). The dimensionality principle and semiotic analysis. Sign Systems Studies, 26, 42– 6.
Danesi, M. (2004). A basic course in anthropological linguistics. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press Inc. (Studies in Linguistics and Cultural Anthropology 2).
Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, signs, and meaning: A basic textbook in semiotics and communication. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
Deely, J. (2001). Physiosemiosis in the semiotic spiral: a play of musement. Sign System Studies, 29, 27-48.
di Sarsina, P.R., & Iseppato, I. (2011). Why we need integrative medicine. EPMA Journal, 2, 5–7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-011-0065-2
Favareau, D. (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Berlin: Springer.
Fleck, L. (2007a). O kryzysie ‘rzeczywistości’. In S. Werner, C. Zittla, & F. Schmaltz (Eds.), Style myślowe i fakty (pp. 55-65). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN. (Original work published in 1929).
Fleck, L. (2007b). O obserwacji naukowej i postrzeganiu w ogóle. In S. Werner, C. Zittla, & F. Schmaltz (Eds.), Style myślowe i fakty (pp.113-147). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN. (Original work published in 1935).
Fonnebo, V., Grimsgaard, S., Walach, H., Ritenbaugh, Ch., Norheim, A.J., Macpherson, H., Lewith, G., Launso, L., Koithan, M., Falkenberg, T., Boon, H., & Aickin, M. (2007). Researching complementary and alternative treatments – the gatekeepers are not at home. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-7
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Ithaca: Cornell UP. (Original work published in 1972).
Goli, F. (2016). Biosemiotic medicine. Healing in the world of meaning. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gregory, R.L. (Ed.). (2004). The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hartelius, G., Friedman, H.L., & Pappas, J.D. (2015). The calling to a spiritual psychology. In H.L.Friedman, &Hartelius, G. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of transpersonal psychology (pp.44-61). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Herman, D. (2003). Stories as a tool for thinking. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences (pp. 163-192). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
Hühn, J.P., Schmid, W., & Schoenert, J. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of narratology. Walter de Gruyter.
Jackendoff, R. (2009). Language, consciousness, culture. Cambridge/Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Javid, A.Z., Haybar, H., Dehghan, P., Haghighizadeh, H.M., Mohaghegh, S.M., Ravanbakhsh, M., Mohammadzadeh, A., & Bahrololumi, S.S. (2018). The effects of melissa officinalis on echocardiography, exercise test, serum biomarkers, and blood pressure in patients with chronic stable angina. Journal of Herbal Medicine. Elsevier. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2017.10.002
Jibu, M., & Yasue, K. (1995). Quantum brain dynamics and consciousness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kitto, K, Ramm, B., Sitbon, L., & Bruza, P. (2011). Quantum theory beyond the physical: information in context. Axiomathes, 21, 331 -345. Springer: published online 14 January 2011. Retrieved September 11, 2019.
Kuhn, T. (1955). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago.
Kull, K. (2000). Thomas A. Sebeok and biology: building biosemiotics. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 230-239.
Lane, R. (2014). Peircean semiotic indeterminacy and its relevance for biosemiotics. V. Romanini, & E. Fernandez (Eds.), Pierce and biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_4
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Martinelli, D. (2007). Zooseimotics. Proposals for a handbook. Seria Acta Semiotica Finnica, XXVI. Helsinki: International Semiotics Institute.
Milgrom, L.R. (2005). The sound of two hands clapping: could homeopathy work locally and nonlocally? Homeopathy, 94, 100-104. Doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2005.02.007
Mishler, E. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood: Ablex.
Mühlhäusler. P. (2003). Language of environment. Environment of language. London: Battlebridge.
Newman, P., & Ratliff, M. (2001). Linguistic fieldwork. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pauli, H.G., White, K.L, & McWhinney, I.R. (2000). Medical education, research, and scientific thinking in the 21st century. Part two. Education for Health, 13(2), 15–25.
Peirce, Ch.S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. Red. Justus Buchler. New York. Dover Publications.
Peirce, Ch.S. (1931–1958). Collected papers (1931–1958). In Ch. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & W. Burks (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Penrose, R. (2005). Shadows of the mind. London:Vintage.
Plotnitsky, A. (2004). The unthinkable: nonclassical theory, the unconscious mind and the quantum brain. G.G. Globus, K.H. Pribram, & G. Vitiello (Eds.), Brain and being. At the boundary between science, philosophy, language and arts (pp. 29-45). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s.
Puppel, S., & Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (Eds.). (2008). New pathways in linguistics. Olsztyn: Institute of Modern Languages and Literature UWM.
Riley, P. (2008). Language, culture and identity. London/New York: Continuum.
Rowe, N., & Braud, W. (2015). Transpersonal education. In H.L. Friedman, & G. Hartelius (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of transpersonal psychology (pp. 666-686). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Sale, J., Lohfeld, L., & Brasil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed –methods research. Quality and Quantity, 36, 43-53.
Scheidt, C.E. (2016). Some reflections on non-substance bound healing effects and the concept of narrative medicine. In F. Goli (Ed.), Biosemiotic medicine. Healing in the world of meaning (pp. 85-94). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (Eds.). (2014). Meditation – neuroscientific approaches and philosophical implications. Dordrecht: Springer.
Snyderman, R., & Weil, A. (2002). Integrative medicine bringing medicine back to its roots. Archives of Internal Medicine. Retrieved July 23, 2019, from PubMed. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.4.395
Thibault, P.J. (In Press/2020). Distributed languaging, affective dynamics, and the human ecology. Volume I: The Sense-making Body.
Thibault, P.J. (In Press/2020). Distributed languaging, affective dynamics, and the human ecology. Volume II: Co-articulating Self and World.
van der Valk, J. M. A., Leon, Ch. J., & Nesbitt, M. (2017). Macroscopic authentication of Chinese materia medica (CMM): A UK market study of seeds and fruits. Journal of Herbal Medicine.Doi.: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hermed.2017.03.007
Vitiello, G. (2001). My double mind. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. New York: George Braziller.
Walach, H. (2000). Magic of signs: A nonlocal interpretation of homeopathy. British Homeopathic Journal, 89(3), 127-140.
Walach, H. (2005 a). Generalised entanglement: A new theoretical model for understanding the effects of complementary and alternative medicine. The Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 11(3), 549-559. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.549
Walach, H. (2005b). The complementarity model of brain-body relationship. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 80-388.
Walach, H. (2015a). Criticisms of transpersonal psychology and beyond – the future of transpersonal psychology: A science and culture of consciousness. In H.L. Friedman, & G. Hartelius (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of transpersonal psychology (pp. 62-87). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Walach, H. (2015 b). Reconstructing the meaning effect - The capacity to self-heal emerges from the Placebo concept. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, 12(23), 111-139. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v12i23.23016
Walach, H. (2019). Subtle cues transmit placebo effects. Nature Human Behavior, 3(12), 1246-1247. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0745-9
Walach, H., & Römer, H. (2011). Generalised entanglement: a nonreductive option for a phenomenologically dualist and ontologically monist view on consciousness. In H. Walach, S. Schmidt, & W.B. Jonas (Eds.), Neuroscience, consciousness and spirituality (pp.81-95). Dordrecht: Springer.
Walach, H., & von Stillfried, N. (2011). Generalised quantum theory—basic idea and general intuition: A background story and overview. Axiomathes, 21(2), 185–209. Retrieved September 11, 2019.
Walleczek, J. (2000). Self-organized biological dynamics and nonlinear control. New York/ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaharias, G. (2018a). Narrative-based medicine and the general practice consultation 2. Canadian Family Physician, 64(4), 286-290.
Zaharias, G. (2018b). What is narrative-based medicine? Canadian Family Physician, 64(3), 176-180.
How to cite this article: Bogusławska-Tafelska, M. (2020). New narration in practicing western integrative medicine: Linguistic, ecolinguistic, and biosemiotic aspects. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 13, 45-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2020.13.3
For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en