JoLIE 15:2/2022

Back to issue page

 

 

 

DEVELOPING METACOGNITIVE SKILLS OF ENGLISH ACADEMIC WRITING: A CASE STUDY OF UKRAINIAN MASTER’S STUDENTS

 

 

Nataliia Gach

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

 

 

 

Abstract

 

This research is aimed at assessing the level of metacognitive skills that Ukrainian graduate students possess in the area of academic writing in English as a foreign language (EFL). The study analyses the state of affairs within higher education from a sociocultural perspective and outlines ways to enhance the learning autonomy of EFL students and thus improve their level of writing competence. The study participants are master’s students majoring in English linguistics and translation studies. Thus, the scope of the research is narrowed to a group of people who study English for specific purposes and have a solid background in English language learning. The survey focuses on assessing their metacognitive skills during the planning, monitoring and evaluation stages of the writing process, as well as providing insight into the role of feedback given by the teacher. The research results demonstrate a strong interdependence between the culture of education established in Ukraine and the country’s socio-political history. It is proved that the main challenges Ukrainian students experience in English academic writing occur during the monitoring and evaluation stages, when the lack of confidence students experience reveals their low level of metacognitive skills. This low level is attributed to a poor knowledge of the conventions of academic discourse, digital illiteracy, which is particularly evident in the inability of students to use word processing programs and library databases, and an inadequate curriculum in which teaching strategies are implemented that are counterproductive to the development of independent learning. The study concludes by highlighting the need for teachers to become more aware of the importance of independent learning and adopt strategies that enhance the level of learner autonomy.

 

Keywords: Survey; Academic writing; Master’s students; Skills; Research.

 

 

References

 

Abadikhah, S., Aliyan, Z., & Talebi, S. (2018). EFL students’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning strategies in academic writing. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 1-17. Retrieved 25 November, 2021, from http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/abadikhah.pdf

 

Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.

 

Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

 

Byrne, D. (1995). Teaching writing skills. London and New York: Longman.

 

Casanave, C. (2002). Writing games: Multicultural case studies of academic literacy practices in higher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Ceylan, N. (2015). Fostering learner autonomy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 85-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.491

 

Chamot, A. (2014). The role of learning strategies in second language acquisition. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 25-43). New York: Routledge.

 

Coffin, C., Curry, M., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. London and New York: Routledge.

 

Cotterall, S. (1999). Key variables in language learning: What do learners believe about them? System, 27, 493-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00047-0

 

Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1-11.

 

Dalbergenova, L., Tleuberdina, G., Amrenova, R., Zhakupova, A., & Duisenbina, A. (2021). Epistemic causal relations in German and Kazakh discursive texts. Astra Salvensis, (Supplement 1/2021), 41-58.

 

Diaz, G. (2013). Metacognitive writing strategies in academic writing: The path to enhance autonomy and to become expert writers. Cordoba: Universidad Nacional de Cordoba.

 

Donato, R., & McCormick, D. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies: The role of mediation. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 453–464.

 

Ermekova, Z.K., Stukalenko, N.M., Tasbulatova, Z.S., Kalymova, A.K., Kainikenova, G.K., & Kulmakhanova, D.U. (2013). Formation of future teachers’ professional skills during the period of pedagogical practice. Life Science Journal, 10(SPL.ISSUE 12), 131-133.

 

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

 

Gabrielatos, C. (2002). EFL writing: Product and process. ERIC, 2, ED47839.

 

Gach, N. (2020). From totalitarianism to democracy: Building learner autonomy in Ukrainian higher education. Issues in Educational Research, 30(2), 532-554.

 

Goctu, R. (2017). Metacognitive strategies in academic writing. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 2(2), 82-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.31578/jebs.v2i2.44

 

Greene, S., & Lidinsky, A. (2015). From inquiry to academic writing: A text and reader. Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

 

Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Mahwah, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

 

Hofstede Insights. (2019). Retrieved 26 November, 2021, from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country/ukraine/

 

Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organisation, 13(1-2), 46-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358

 

Hort, S. (2020). Digital writing, word processors and operations in texts: How student writers use digital resources in academic writing processes. Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), 43-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.596

 

Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000071

 

Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-286. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0

 

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Hyland, K. (2016). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116-125. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002

 

Ivanič, R., Clark R., & Rimmershaw, R. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments. In M. Lea, & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 47-65). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

 

Jančaříková, R., Povolná, R., Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O., Hanušová, S., & Němec, M. (2020). An academic writing needs analysis of Czech university graduate students. Discourse and Interaction, 13(1), 42-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2020-1-42

 

Karyotaki, M., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2017). Attentional control and other executive functions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3), 219-233. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i03.6587

 

Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/ EFL writing and going just beyond. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 219-232). Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.

 

Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (2007). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana: NCTE.

 

Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 217-236. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.04.001

 

Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088308319229

 

Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5-32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5

 

Lillis, T., & Swann, J. (2003). Giving feedback on student writing. Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. London and New York: Routledge.

 

Little, D., Dam, L., & Legehausen, L. (2017). Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

 

Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2011). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 641-678. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5

 

Mu, C. (2005). A taxonomy of ESL writing strategies. Singapore: Proceedings Redesigning Pedagogy: Research, Policy, Practice.

 

Mulligan, Ch., & Garofalo, R. (2011). A collaborative writing approach: Methodology and student assessment. The Language Teacher, 35(3), 5-10. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.37546/JALTTLT35.3-1

 

Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142-179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088312438529

 

Nunan, D. (2013). Learner-centered English language education. New York and London: Routledge.

 

O’Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Pennington, M. (1990). An evaluation of word processing for ESL writers. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 9(1), 77-113.

 

Prastyo, H. (2014). Teaching academic writing based on need analysis for Indonesian EFL learners at university. In Proceedings of the 61st TEFLIN International Conference (pp. 104-107). Surakarta: UNS Solo.

 

Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 54-66). Guilford Press.  

 

Raimes, A. (1998). Teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 142-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003524

 

Ramadhanti, D., Ghazali, A.S., Hasanah, M., & Harsiati, T. (2019). Students’ metacognitive weaknesses in academic writing: A preliminary research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(11), 41-57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i11.10213

 

Reid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Hoboken: Prentice Hall Regents.

 

Rezaei, M., & Jafari, M. (2014). Investigating the levels, types, and causes of writing anxiety among Iranian EFL students: A mixed method design. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1545-1554. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.577

 

Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2018). Writing regulation processes in higher education: A review of two decades of empirical research. Reading and Writing, 31, 757-777.

 

Serra, M., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278–298). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Shynkaruk, V., & Kharchenko, S. (2020). Communicative-functional potential of incentive modality in psycholinguistic dimension. Psycholinguistics, 28(2), 183-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-28-2-183-203

 

Stewart, M. (2020). Weaving personal experience into academic writings. Writing spaces: Readings on writing. Anderson: Parlor Press LLC.

 

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

 

Swanson, H. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306-314.

 

Tsai, M., & Tsai, C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43-50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1355800032000038822

 

 

How to cite this article: Gach, N. (2022). Developing metacognitive skills of English academic writing: A case study of Ukrainian master’s students. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 15(2), 73-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2022.15.2.7

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en