JoLIE 15:2/2022
LINGUISTIC AND COMMUNICATIVE MODELLING IN THE THEATRICAL INTERVIEW GENRE
Valentyna Galats`ka
Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, Dnipro, Ukraine
Viktoria Filipenko
Dnipro Medical Institute of Traditional and Non-Traditional Medicine, Dnipro, Ukraine
Dnipro Medical Institute Traditional and Non-Traditional Medicine, Dnipro, Ukraine
Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Ludmyla Kutsenko
Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University, Dnipro, Ukraine
Abstract
We consider the interview genre to be a dialogic interaction, in which all participants can actively contribute to the discourse construction. The theatrical interview enables the joint activity of a group of communicants to be presented in the pages of a periodical. The participants in the dialogue set the time and space limits of the expressions and the speech moves of the respondents. The journalist adds to, summarises or adjusts the answers, regulates the alternation of the cues, and actively influences the processes of topical control. Dialogue encourages communicants to select the set of expressions that most effectively represent their intentions and communicative purpose. All of this requires developing the right strategy by employing tactics that include the influence of various factors, reducing communicative noises by exploiting the necessary language potential, stylistics, variability of communicative models and social roles, syntax, and modal elements. By ‘strategy’ in the genre of the theatrical interview, we mean the most effective implementation of the intentions of the speaker, which considers the personal (status-role and psychological) characteristics of the communicants. These intentions are focused on achieving a specific communicative goal, dictated by communicative experience, which subordinates the participants in the interview to the laws and norms of the appropriate (in the study of the theatre) sphere of communication and modelled conversational situation. It should be noted that this system of tactics is not limited by the above-mentioned parameters and is an open, constantly updated system. It provides an interesting discursive framing of the thought, programming the broad cultural context of the globalised theatrical epoch of Ukraine.
Keywords: Theatre; Communication; Speaker; Communication Strategy; Journalist; Interviewer.
References
Apalat, G.P. (2003). Structure, semantics and pragmatics of interview texts. Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Auanasova, A., Nurpeisov, E., Auanassova, K., Kushenova, G., & Mukhlissov, N. (2022). The history of the Alash Party in the context of the impact on the processes of constitutional acts. Ancient Asia, 13, article number 6.
Den. (2021). Retrieved November 29, 2021, from https://day.kyiv.ua/
Goncharova, N.V. (2002). Axiological structure of English dialogical discourse. Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Grice, H.P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning and word meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 225-242.
Ivanova, I.B. (2018). Evolution of linguistic stylistics of advertising discourse in the language space of Ukraine. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Kino Teatr Magazine. (2021). Retrieved 29 November, 2021, from https://ktm.ukma.edu.ua/index.php/ktm
Klyuev, E. V. (2002). Speech communication. Moscow: RIPOL KLASSIK.
Koshekov, K.T., Kobenko, V.Y., Anayatova, R.K., Savostin, A.A., & Koshekov, A.K. (2021). Automatic classification method of the speaker’s emotional state by voice. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1791(1), 012051.
Kyiv Insider. (2017). Retrieved 28 November, 2021, from http://www.theinsider.ua/
Lakoff, R.T. (1977). What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics and performatives. In R. Rogers, R. Wall, & J. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, Presuppositions and implicatures (pp. 79-106). Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman.
Levenkova, E.R. (2011). Informative strategy in American political discourse. Samara: Volga Region State Social-Humanitarian Academy.
Levinson, S.C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Serazhym, K.S. (2003). Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon of modern communicative space. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Teatral’na besida. (2008). Retrieved 28 November, 2021, from http://teatralnabesida.org.ua/
Tertychny, O. (2002). Do editors need freedom of the press? Mirror of the Week, 49, 19-25.
Theater and Concert Kyiv. (2021). Retrieved 28 November, 2021, from https://www.tkk.media/
Theatrical journal “Proscenium”. (2021). Retrieved 27 November, 2021, from http://publications.lnu.edu.ua/journals/index.php/proscaenium
Zasiekin, S.V. (2001). Discursive markers of coherence of the English-language dialogue: Cognitive and pragmatic aspects. Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
ZN. UA. (2021). Retrieved 27 November, 2021, from https://zn.ua/ukr/
How to cite this article: Galats`ka, V., Filipenko, V., Davydenko, I., Temchenko, L., & Kutsenko, L. (2022). Linguistic and communicative modelling in the theatrical interview genre. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 15(2), 101-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2022.15.2.8
For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en