JoLIE 16:2/2023

 

Back to issue page

 

 

 

MANIPULATION THROUGH WORDS IN ORWELL`S NINETEEN EIGHTY-FOUR[1]

 

 

Luciana Daniela Lazea

1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia

 

 

 

Abstract

 

This article investigates how linguistic engineering in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four functions as a primary instrument of ideological domination within a totalitarian regime. Through a discourse-analytic examination of Newspeak structures, Party slogans, and excerpts from Winston Smith’s diary, the study explores how lexical reduction, semantic inversion, and morphological regularisation are exploited to restrict conceptual possibilities and erode critical thought. Drawing on theories of language and power, the analysis highlights how Newspeak’s controlled vocabulary limits nuance, suppresses oppositional meanings, and constructs a politically sanctioned reality in which contradictions are normalised. The findings suggest that Orwell’s fictional system anticipates contemporary techniques of mass manipulation, demonstrating how deliberate constraints on linguistic form can reshape cognitive processes and reinforce authoritarian control. Ultimately, the study underscores the centrality of language as a tool for both social organisation and psychological coercion in oppressive political environments.

 

Key words: Newspeak; Discourse manipulation; Linguistic control; Ideology; Orwell.

 

 

References

 

Chomsky, N. (1991). Media control: The spectacular achievements of propaganda. Seven Stories Press.

 

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

 

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)

 

Fowler, R. (1995). The language of George Orwell. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24210-8

 

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

 

Gerhard, J. (2012). Control and resistance in the dystopian novel: A comparative analysis (Master’s thesis, California State University, Chico). California State University, Chico. Retrieved from: https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/downloads/4b29b648d

 

Ingle, S. (2006). The social and political thought of George Orwell: A reassessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086094

 

Orwell, G. (2008). Nineteen Eighty-Four. Penguin.

 

Pruteanu, G. (1997, April 19). Limbã de lemn (II). 4-Doar o vorbã. Archived at Internet Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20140428222833/http://www.pruteanu.ro/4doarovorba/emis030-034.htm

 

Stoica, D. S. (2016). On wooden language and manipulation. Argumentum. Journal of the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric, 14(1), 102–120.

 

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.

 

Wodak, R. (2009). The discursive construction of national identity (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

 

 

How to cite this paper: Lazea, L. D. (2023). Manipulation through words in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 16(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2023.16.2.6  

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en

 



[1] The current paper was elaborated as part of the MA course in Metaphorology in contemporary media, led by Professor Teodora Popescu, academic year 2022-2023, 1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia, Romania.