JoLIE 17:3/2024

 

Back to issue page

 

 

 

TRANSFORMING ACADEMIC WRITING WITH AI: TOOLS FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING

 

 

Teodora Popescu A green circle with white letters

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia, Romania

 

 

 

Abstract

 

Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly through chatbots like ChatGPT, is increasingly integrated into education, especially writing instruction. While its potential to support writing development is acknowledged, its full pedagogical value remains underexplored. This paper examines how ChatGPT can be used in classrooms to simulate real-world writing tasks—such as argumentative and creative writing—and its role in enhancing proficiency across genres. It also addresses the ethical and instructional implications of integrating AI into the writing process.

This analysis examined revision data from eleven student texts to explore how various error types, word count changes, and revision behaviours relate to improvements in essay quality. The goal was to understand whether measurable features of revision correlate with outcomes such as improved essay scores and CAE grades. The paper also provides practical guidelines for teachers on incorporating ChatGPT into writing instruction.

Findings show that ChatGPT offers immediate, valuable feedback that supports revision and improves student writing. It assists with structural, grammatical, and stylistic issues, though its suggestions require critical evaluation to avoid over-reliance. While ChatGPT boosts engagement and fosters creativity, maintaining student independence remains essential.

In conclusion, when used thoughtfully, ChatGPT can be a powerful tool in writing education, offering interactive feedback and personalised support. However, educators must use it ethically and responsibly, ensuring it complements rather than replaces traditional instruction. Further research is needed to assess AI’s long-term impact on writing and to develop best practices for its integration.

 

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; ChatGPT; Writing education; Feedback; Pedagogical practices, EFL error correction.

 

 

References

 

Alexander, K., Savvidou, C., & Alexander, C. (2023). Who wrote this essay? Detecting Ai-generated writing in second language education in higher education. Teaching English with Technology. doi: https://doi.org/10.56297/buka4060/xhld5365

 

Al-Obaydi, L. H., Pikhart, M., & Klimova, B. (2023). ChatGPT and the general concepts of education: Can artificial intelligence-driven chatbots support the process of language learning? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(21), 39–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i21.42593

 

Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745

 

Bellman, R. (1978). An introduction to artificial intelligence: can computers think?. Boyd & Fraser.

 

Boskabadi, E.; Nikfar, M.; Ugwuoke, J.; Ali, H. (2024). ChatGPT in Teaching and Learning: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 643. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060643

 

Burkhardt, J., MacDonald, M., & Rathemarcher, A. (2010). Teaching information literacy. American Library Association.

 

Cambridge University Press & Assessment. (2024). Teacher guide for writing: C1 Advanced. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/600976-teacher-guide-for-writing-c1-advanced.pdf

 

Chodorow, M., Gamon, M., & Tetreault, J. (2010). The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment. Language Testing, 27(3), 419–436. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210364391

 

De Laat, M., Joksimovic, S., & Ifenthaler, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence, real-time feedback and workplace learning analytics to support in situ complex problem-solving: A commentary. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(5), 267–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2020-0026

 

Delen, D. (2010). A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management. Decision Support Systems, 49(4), 498–506. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.06.003.

 

Ferlazzo, L. (January 18, 2023). 19 Ways to use ChatGPT in your classroom. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-19-ways-to-use-chatgptin-your-classroom/2023/01

 

Frankfurt, H. (2005). On Bullshit, Princeton.

 

Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., Fuller, S., Singh, M., Arora, P., Parlikad, A. K., Stankovski, V., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Lutfiyya, H., Kanhere, S. S., Bahsoon, R., Rana, O., Dustdar, S., Sakellariou, R., Uhlig, S., & Buyya, R. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002

 

Gonda, D. E., & Chu, B. (2019). Chatbot as a learning resource? Creating conversational bots as a supplement for teaching assistant training course. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education (TALE), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 10–13 December 2019 (pp. 1–5). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9225974

 

Gottschalk, K., & Hjortshoj, K. (2004). The elements of teaching writing: A resource for instructors in all disciplines. Bedford/St. Martin’s.

 

Habeb Al-Obaydi, L., Pikhart, M., & Klimova, B. (2023). ChatGPT and the General Concepts of Education: Can Artificial Intelligence-Driven Chatbots Support the Process of Language Learning?. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 18(21), pp. 39–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i21.42593

 

Hicks, M. T., Humphries, J., & Slater, J. (2024). ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology, 26, Article 38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5

 

Jasin, J., Ng, H. T., Atmosukarto, I., Iyer, P., Osman, F., Wong, P. Y. K., Pua, C. Y., & Cheow, W. S. (2023). The implementation of chatbot-mediated immediacy for synchronous communication in an online chemistry course. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 10665–10690. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11602-1

 

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed - an argument for AI in education. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475756/

 

OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT (May 16 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/

 

Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism. Norfolk.

 

Popescu, T. (2013). A corpus-based approach to translation error analysis: A case-study of Romanian EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 242–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.048

 

Ramos, J. (2023). ChatGPT for Education: A Practical Guide. Berlin: Verlag GD Publishing Ltd. & Co KG.

 

Skrabut, S. (2023). 80 Ways to use ChatGPT in the classroom using AI to enhance teaching and learning.

 

Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M. et al. (2024). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22943–22968. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1

 

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., et al. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

 

 

How to cite this article: Popescu, T. (2024). Transforming academic writing with AI: Tools for effective learning. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 17(3), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2024.17.3.8

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en