JoLIE 18:1/2025

 

Back to issue page 

 

 

 

UNLOCKING THE POWER OF WORDS: EXPLORING FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE IN ‘DEAD POETS SOCIETY’

 

 

Denisa Nana

1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia, Romania

 

 

 

Abstract

 

This study investigates the use of figurative language in the film Dead Poets Society, focusing on how figures of speech function as systematic resources for meaning-making in cinematic dialogue. Drawing on cognitive linguistics and stylistic analysis, the paper examines metaphors, similes, irony, and proverbs as interrelated components of a coherent figurative language system. The analysis is based on a qualitative examination of selected dialogue excerpts, which are presented as numbered data and interpreted through close textual analysis.

The findings demonstrate that figurative language in the film is not merely decorative but plays a central role in structuring abstract concepts such as mortality, time, agency, conformity, and identity. Metaphor emerges as the conceptual foundation of this system, while similes make metaphorical mappings explicit, irony encodes evaluative stance, and proverbs and idiomatic expressions conventionalise figurative meaning. Together, these figures of speech contribute to the film’s philosophical coherence and guide audience interpretation without overt exposition.

By treating figurative language as a structured and functional system rather than as isolated devices, the study contributes to linguistic approaches to film discourse and supports the view that cinematic dialogue constitutes a productive site for figurative language analysis. The paper also acknowledges the interpretive, corpus-based, and cultural limitations of the study, pointing to directions for future research in cross-textual, cross-linguistic, and reception-oriented investigations.

 

Key words: Figurative language; Metaphor; Cognitive linguistics; Stylistic analysis; Dead Poets Society.

 

 

References

 

Abrams, M. H. (1999). A glossary of literary terms (7th ed.). Heinle & Heinle.

 

Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. G. (2012). A glossary of literary terms (10th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

 

Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. Continuum.

 

Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge University Press.

 

Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge University Press.

 

Goatly, A. (2005). The language of metaphors (2nd ed.). Routledge.

 

Hutcheon, L. (2006). A theory of adaptation. Routledge.

 

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1980)

 

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.

 

Metz, C. (1991). Film language: A semiotics of the cinema (M. Taylor, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1974)

 

Popescu, T. (2025). Research in applied linguistics and language education: Design, methods, and analysis. Presa Universitarã Clujeanã. https://doi.org/10.29302/ResearchApplLing_LangEduc.popescu.t

 

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.

 

Stam, R. (2000). Film theory: An introduction. Blackwell.

 

Weir, P. (Director). (1989). Dead Poets Society [Film]. Touchstone Pictures.

 

 

How to cite this article: Nana, D. (2025). Unlocking the power of words: Exploring figurative language in Dead Poets Society. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 18(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2025.18.1.7

 

For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en