VIETNAMESE LAW STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES WITHIN THE READING ACROSS THE CURRICULUM (RAC) MODEL
Nguyen Huu
Chanh
University of Health Sciences, Viet Nam National University, Ho Chi Minh City
Abstract
This study investigates Vietnamese law students’ perceptions of metacognitive reading strategies embedded within the Reading Across the Curriculum (RAC) model and implemented in an English for Legal Purposes (ELP) course. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach and drawing on the framework of Kim and Anderson (2023), the study collected quantitative data through a questionnaire examining course content, perceived reading support, academic confidence, transferable skills, and overall engagement, alongside qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that students perceived metacognitive reading strategies integrated into RAC activities as particularly useful for supporting their understanding of complex legal texts, increasing academic confidence, and fostering active engagement with course materials. Participants also valued the collaborative aspects of the RAC model, which promoted peer interaction and a sense of learning community. Overall, the findings underscore the importance of explicit instructional guidance and motivational support when implementing metacognitive strategies in discipline-specific EFL contexts. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting students’ perceived benefits and limitations of metacognitive strategy instruction within legal education in Viet Nam.
Keywords: Metacognitive strategies; Reading across the curriculum (RAC); Vietnamese law students; English for Legal Purposes (ELP).
References
Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063-1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5
Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235-244. https://doi.org.10.5539/elt.v6n10p235
Anderson, T. & Kim, J. (2011). Strengthening college students’ success through the RAC. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42(1), 61-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2011.10850348
Badger, R. (2003). Legal and general: towards a genre analysis of newspaper law reports. English for Specific Purposes, 22(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00020-0
Baffy, M. (2017). Shifting frames to construct a Legal English class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.11.003
Candlin, C. N., Bhatia, V. K., & Jensen, C. H. (2002). Developing legal writing materials for English second language learners: Problems and perspectives. English for specific purposes, 21(4), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00029-1
Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL quarterly, 23(4), 647-678. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587536
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds?. Currents in pharmacy teaching and learning, 10(6), 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
de-la-Peña, C., & Luque-Rojas, M. J. (2021). Levels of reading comprehension in higher education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712901
Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Evaluating the predictive power of metacognitive reading strategies across diverse educational contexts. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00240-3
Horníèková, M., & Stranovská, E. (2022). Reading competence in the second foreign language and its measurement. Journal of Language and Intercultural Education (JoLIE), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2022.3.9
Khellab, F., Demirel, Ö., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Effect of teaching metacognitive reading strategies on reading comprehension of engineering students. Sage Open, 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221138069
Kim, J. Y., & Anderson, T. N. (2023). The efficacy of metacognitive reading strategies in the college classroom: Student perception towards the learning experience. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.80
La, M. N. B. (2022). Code-switching in Legal English classes: Teachers’ practices and beliefs. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(3), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2203389L
Maasum, T. N. R. T. M., & Maarof, N. (2012). Empowering ESL readers with metacognitive reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1250-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.058
Nash-Ditzel, S. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850330
Nhac, H. T., & Nguyen, N. H. D. (2024). Learners’ perspectives on native language usage in English-For-Law classes at a Vietnamese tertiary institution. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 12(3), 727-739. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP241004054N
Pammu, A., Amir, Z., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014). Metacognitive reading strategies of less proficient tertiary learners: A case study of EFL learners at a public university in Makassar, Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.049
Poole, R. (2021). A corpus-aided study of stance adverbs in judicial opinions and the implications for English for Legal Purposes instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 62, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.01.002
ªen, H. ª. (2009). The relationship between the use of metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2301-2305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.404
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
Taki, S. (2016). Metacognitive online reading strategy use: Readers' perceptions in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 409-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12048
Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1) https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
Xia, S. A. (2020). English for specific purposes in the digital era: What has changed? Interview with Vijay Bhatia. RELC Journal, 51(1), 188-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219895328
Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 894-898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164
Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive strategies as points in teaching reading comprehension. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 593-600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.091
How to cite this article: Chanh, N. H. (2025). Vietnamese law students’ perceptions of metacognitive reading strategies within the Reading Across the Curriculum (RAC) model. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 18(3), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2025.18.3.5
For details on subscription, go to: http://jolie.uab.ro/index.php?pagina=-&id=19&l=en